DevOps School

---

Quick Definition

Plain-English definition: Spot instances are spare compute capacity offered by cloud providers at steep discounts with the requirement that the provider can reclaim that capacity at short notice.

Analogy: Think of spot instances like last-minute discounted hotel rooms; you get a steep price cut but the hotel may need the room back at any time if a full-paying guest arrives.

Formal technical line: Spot instances are preemptible or interruptible virtual machine instances where availability is variable and termination can be triggered by the provider based on capacity or pricing events.

If “spot instances” has multiple meanings, the most common meaning is cloud provider spare-capacity compute. Other meanings:

• Interruptible VMs in managed PaaS or batch services.
• Market-based bidding compute offerings in some cloud vendor APIs.
• Locally preemptible worker nodes in on-premise cluster implementations.

---

What is spot instances?

What it is / what it is NOT

• What it is: A cost-optimized compute model where instances run on surplus capacity and can be terminated or reclaimed by the provider with little warning.
• What it is NOT: A guaranteed SLA-backed instance type; not suitable for stateful apps that cannot tolerate sudden termination without mitigation.

Key properties and constraints

• Low cost relative to on-demand, typically up to 70–90% savings.
• Ephemeral lifecycle: instances can be stopped, terminated, or reclaimed.
• Variable availability: supply depends on provider capacity and region.
• Short termination notice: often from 30 seconds to a few minutes.
• No guaranteed capacity at scale; bulk launches may not all succeed.
• Tied to provider policies: pricing and reclamation mechanics vary by vendor.

Where it fits in modern cloud/SRE workflows

• Batch jobs, stateless services, machine learning training, CI runners, data processing, and horizontally scalable workloads.
• Integrated into autoscaling and mixed-instance groups to blend reliability and cost.
• Used with spot-aware scheduling, checkpointing, and drainage automation in Kubernetes and cloud-native platforms.

Text-only “diagram description” readers can visualize

• Central controller (scheduler) assigns tasks to a mixed fleet: on-demand instances for critical pods and spot instances for low-priority or stateless pods.
• Spot nodes run workloads, emit telemetry to observability backplane, and register lifecycle events to a termination handler.
• On termination notice, the termination handler triggers graceful drain, checkpoint, and rescheduling to on-demand or other spot capacity.

spot instances in one sentence

Spot instances are deeply discounted, interruptible compute instances provided from excess capacity that require fault-tolerant architecture and automation to use safely.

spot instances vs related terms (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Term	How it differs from spot instances	Common confusion
T1	Preemptible VM	Similar concept but specific vendors use different names and notice windows	People think identical across clouds
T2	Reserved instance	Reserved is commitment-based fixed capacity and billing model	Confused as cheaper spot alternative
T3	Savings plan	Billing commitment not about reclamation risk	Mistaken as competing preemptible model
T4	On-demand instance	On-demand is full-price and not interruptible	Assumed equivalent availability
T5	Spot Fleet	A managed mixed fleet using spot and other types	Assume Fleet only uses spot
T6	Spot market bidding	Older model where customers bid price; many clouds no longer require bids	Thought still required on major clouds

Row Details (only if any cell says “See details below”)

• None

---

Why does spot instances matter?

Business impact (revenue, trust, risk)

• Cost savings can materially reduce infrastructure spend and increase margin for SaaS or data-heavy businesses.
• Lower cost enables experimentation and larger-scale AI/ML training without proportional budget increases.
• Reclaims and interruptions, if unmitigated, increase customer-facing errors, impacting trust and revenue.

Engineering impact (incident reduction, velocity)

• Proper automation reduces toil and improves deployment velocity by allowing more compute experimentation.
• Misuse increases incident volume and on-call strain when ephemeral events are not handled.
• Adoption demands robust CI/CD, observability, and automated remediation to keep incidents low.

SRE framing (SLIs/SLOs/error budgets/toil/on-call)

• SLIs may include availability with and without spot-backed components separated.
• SLOs need explicit rules for degraded behavior when spot capacity is reclaimed.
• Error budgets should account for planned interruptions through reserve capacity strategies.
• Toil rises if manual replacement or reconfiguration is required for spot interruptions.

3–5 realistic “what breaks in production” examples

• A background job processing window is interrupted mid-run, causing duplicate processing or lost work.
• Autoscaling fails to launch sufficient non-spot replacements, causing throttled traffic and higher latency.
• Stateful caches on spot nodes are lost without replication, causing cache misses and backend load spikes.
• CI pipelines relying on spot runners time out due to intermittent unavailability, blocking releases.
• Cost forecasting misses spot churn impacts, inflating projected savings and causing budget surprises.

---

Where is spot instances used? (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Layer/Area	How spot instances appears	Typical telemetry	Common tools
L1	Edge	Rarely used for low-latency edge functions	Service latency and cold-start rates	Edge-specific orchestrators
L2	Network	Used for batch proxy or analysis nodes	Packet capture job completion	Network analyzers
L3	Service	Stateless microservices scaled horizontally	Request success and latency per instance	Kubernetes, AWS ASG
L4	Application	Batch jobs and noncritical APIs	Job completion and retry counts	Batch schedulers
L5	Data	ETL, distributed training, streaming backfill	Throughput and checkpoint age	Spark, Flink, Ray
L6	IaaS	Interruptible VM instances	Instance lifecycle events and spot termns	Cloud provider APIs
L7	PaaS	Managed batch or preemptible tasks	Task restarts and failure reasons	Managed batch services
L8	SaaS	Rare in customer-facing SaaS unless hidden	Overall error rates, user impact	Managed offerings
L9	Kubernetes	Node pools with spot nodes or taints	Node termination events and pod evictions	Kube controllers
L10	Serverless	Spare workers for background jobs in some vendors	Invocation failures and cold starts	Managed serverless

Row Details (only if needed)

• None

---

When should you use spot instances?

When it’s necessary

• For fault-tolerant batch processing where cost predominates over latency.
• For large-scale ML training or hyperparameter sweeps where compute hours are the primary cost driver.
• For non-critical dev/test environments that mirror production at low cost.

When it’s optional

• For horizontally scalable stateless services with health checks and autoscaling.
• For CI runners that can checkpoint or re-run failed jobs without manual intervention.

When NOT to use / overuse it

• For single-instance stateful databases, session stores, or other services without replication.
• For low-latency user-facing features where interruption causes UXR degradation.
• In systems lacking automation for graceful termination and rescheduling.

Decision checklist

• If workload is stateless AND can restart quickly -> consider spot.
• If workload requires durable local state AND cannot replicate -> do not use spot.
• If you require guaranteed capacity during peak -> combine with on-demand/reserved.

Maturity ladder: Beginner -> Intermediate -> Advanced

• Beginner: Run only batch jobs on spot with manual retries and minimal automation.
• Intermediate: Use spot node pools in Kubernetes and implement termination handlers and autoscaling policies.
• Advanced: Implement mixed-instance autoscaling, predictive replenishment, checkpointing, and spot-aware schedulers integrated with cost dashboards.

Example decision for small teams

• Small startup with a limited SRE staff: Use spot for nightly data ETL and noncritical ML experiments; keep customer-facing services on on-demand.

Example decision for large enterprises

• Large enterprise: Use mixed instance groups with automated draining, priority-based scheduling, and formal SLOs; leverage spot for scale-out jobs and training while maintaining on-demand reserve for critical baseline capacity.

---

How does spot instances work?

Components and workflow

• Provider layer: Publishes spare capacity and termination signals.
• Control plane: Scheduling/orchestration (Kubernetes, cloud autoscaler) that understands node lifecycle.
• Workloads: Must be fault-tolerant and able to resume or be rescheduled.
• Automation: Termination handlers, pod disruption budgets, checkpoint/restore mechanisms.
• Observability: Telemetry on instance state, job progress, and termination rates.

Data flow and lifecycle

1. Request spot capacity via API or fleet configuration.
2. Provider allocates spare capacity; instances boot.
3. Workloads start; telemetry streams to monitoring.
4. Provider issues termination notice or reclaims resource.
5. Termination handler drains, checkpoints, and signals scheduler.
6. Scheduler resubmits work to available capacity.

Edge cases and failure modes

• No spare capacity available at scale request time.
• Termination notice arrives during critical commit operations.
• Sudden cross-region reclamation causing correlated failures.
• Autoscaler fails to provision replacement capacity due to quotas.

Short practical example (pseudocode)

• Pseudocode: When spot termination notice received -> run preStop hook -> checkpoint state to durable store -> cordon node -> let scheduler reschedule pods -> terminate.

Typical architecture patterns for spot instances

• Mixed Instance Group: Combine on-demand and spot instances in one autoscaling group for baseline reliability.
• Spot-only Batch Pool: Use an autoscaling pool of spot nodes for large batch workloads with checkpointing.
• Spot-backed Kubernetes Node Pool: Separate node pool with taints/labels for low-priority workloads.
• Eviction-Aware Queue Workers: Message queue consumers that checkpoint progress and requeue unprocessed messages on termination.
• Checkpoint-and-Resume ML Training: Periodic checkpointing to object storage and resume logic in training scripts.
• Canary Spot Services: Run small percentages of traffic on spot nodes for low-risk, cost-optimized production testing.

Failure modes & mitigation (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Failure mode	Symptom	Likely cause	Mitigation	Observability signal
F1	Sudden mass eviction	Multiple instance termns at once	Provider capacity reallocation	Mixed groups and reserve capacity	Spike in termination events
F2	Long launch latencies	Delayed scaling up	Insufficient region capacity	Pre-warm instances or fallback	Increased scaling time metric
F3	Lost local state	Task restarted with missing data	No replication or checkpointing	Use durable storage and replication	Error rates on persistence ops
F4	Job duplication	Same job processed twice	No dedupe or idempotency	Add idempotency and dedupe keys	Duplicate task IDs in logs
F5	Autoscaler misconfiguration	No replacements launched	Wrong IAM or quota exhausted	Validate permissions and quotas	Autoscaler error events
F6	Visibility blind spots	Termination reason unknown	Missing termination event handlers	Implement provider hooks	Lack of termination logs
F7	Thundering restarts	Flood of restarts on recover	Poor backoff or no queueing	Exponential backoff and queueing	Retry spikes and queue depth
F8	Cost leakage	Spot not used as intended	Mislabeling and policy drift	Enforce IaC and cost policies	Unexpected billing increases

Row Details (only if needed)

• None

---

Key Concepts, Keywords & Terminology for spot instances

Glossary (40+ terms)

1. Spot instance — An interruptible VM provided from spare capacity — Cost-focused compute — Pitfall: assuming stable availability.
2. Preemptible VM — Vendor-specific name for spot-like VM — Same behavior conceptually — Pitfall: different termination windows.
3. Eviction — Forced termination by provider — Signals resource reclamation — Pitfall: missing handling leads to data loss.
4. Termination notice — Short time window before eviction — Enables graceful shutdown — Pitfall: not all providers send one.
5. Mixed-instance group — Group mixing spot and on-demand — Balances cost and reliability — Pitfall: wrong weights cause capacity gaps.
6. Checkpointing — Periodic save of job state — Enables resume after interruption — Pitfall: coarse checkpoint frequency increases wasted work.
7. Spot fleet — Managed set of spot instances across types — Improves allocation diversity — Pitfall: fleet policies misconfigured.
8. Instance reclaim — Provider action to take back instance — Equivalent of eviction — Pitfall: sudden reclaim at scale.
9. Taints and tolerations — Kubernetes controls to isolate workloads — Used to keep critical pods off spot nodes — Pitfall: mislabeling blocks scheduling.
10. Node drain — Graceful eviction of pods from a node — Required for safe termination — Pitfall: drain may timeout if not configured.
11. PodDisruptionBudget — K8s spec limiting disruptions — Protects service availability — Pitfall: too strict blocks scaling down.
12. Idempotency — Operation property of safe retries — Reduces duplicate effects — Pitfall: implementing incorrectly causes duplicate writes.
13. Checkpoint storage — Durable storage for checkpoints — Commonly object storage — Pitfall: performance bottleneck for frequent checkpoints.
14. Capacity-optimized allocation — Provider strategy to minimize interruptions — Improves stability — Pitfall: still not guaranteed.
15. Price-based bidding — Old spot model using bid prices — Mostly deprecated on major clouds — Pitfall: assumes bidding controls interruptions.
16. Region/Zone variability — Different supply per location — Affects availability — Pitfall: one-region reliance causes correlated failures.
17. Launch template — Template for VM configuration — Ensures consistent instance settings — Pitfall: outdated template causes drift.
18. Auto-scaling group — Collection of instances scaled by rules — Can mix instance types — Pitfall: scaling rules ignore spot specifics.
19. Spot interruption handler — Component listening for termination alerts — Automates graceful shutdown — Pitfall: missing handler leaves pods in unknown state.
20. Warm pool — Pre-warmed instances kept ready — Reduces launch delays — Pitfall: increases baseline cost.
21. Job checkpoint frequency — How often jobs save state — Balances overhead and rework — Pitfall: too infrequent loses work.
22. StatefulSet — K8s pattern for stateful workloads — Not suitable for raw spot nodes — Pitfall: persistent volume tie causes data issues.
23. Pod topology spread — Distribute pods across failure domains — Mitigates correlated losses — Pitfall: complex constraints slow scheduling.
24. Spot-aware scheduler — Scheduler considering spot node volatility — Optimizes placement — Pitfall: adds complexity to scheduling logic.
25. Graceful termination — Proper shutdown sequence on notice — Prevents data corruption — Pitfall: assumptions about notice length.
26. Draining timeout — Time before force kill during drain — Must match workload shutdown — Pitfall: too short causes failed cleanups.
27. Durable queues — Message systems that survive worker restarts — Enables reliable retries — Pitfall: poorly configured ack semantics.
28. Checkpoint/restore — Save and load job state — Useful for long jobs — Pitfall: incompatible formats between versions.
29. Capacity fallback — Automatic switch to on-demand on shortage — Ensures reliability — Pitfall: sudden bill increases if unmonitored.
30. Pre-warming — Start instances before need — Reduces delay — Pitfall: increases cost and complexity.
31. Spot price volatility — Fluctuating cost for older models — Affects cost predictability — Pitfall: wrong forecasting assumptions.
32. Node eviction storm — Correlated evictions causing cascading failures — High-impact event — Pitfall: insufficient reserve capacity.
33. Billing granularity — How provider charges spot instances — Important for cost models — Pitfall: misunderstanding minute vs second billing.
34. Scheduler preemption policy — Rules for evicting lower priority pods — Ensures higher-priority survive — Pitfall: misconfigured priorities.
35. Durable object store — Recommended for checkpoints and artifacts — Protects data across evictions — Pitfall: costs and egress.
36. Resiliency testing — Chaos engineering including spot termns — Validates system behavior — Pitfall: lack of production-like testing.
37. Quota limits — Provider restrictions on instance counts — Can block replacements — Pitfall: forgotten quotas during scale events.
38. IAM permissions — Permissions to manage instances and hooks — Required for automation — Pitfall: overprivileged or underprivileged roles.
39. Pod termination lifecycle — Sequence of preStop, SIGTERM, grace period, SIGKILL — Critical to implement — Pitfall: ignoring lifecycle hooks.
40. Retry backoff — Strategy to reduce thundering retries — Protects downstream services — Pitfall: constant short retries overload systems.
41. Checkpoint consistency — Guarantee that checkpoint represents usable state — Ensures correctness on resume — Pitfall: partial writes or corruptions.
42. Preemption windows — Time between notice and hard termination — Varies by provider — Pitfall: assuming long windows.

---

How to Measure spot instances (Metrics, SLIs, SLOs) (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Metric/SLI	What it tells you	How to measure	Starting target	Gotchas
M1	Spot eviction rate	Fraction of spot instances reclaimed	Termination events / total spot instances	< 5% per day for stable workloads	Varies by region
M2	Time to reschedule	Time until workload restarted after eviction	Event to pod running time	< 2 minutes for short jobs	Dependent on quotas
M3	Job completion success	Success rate of batch jobs using spot	Completed jobs / total started	99% for noncritical jobs	Checkpointing affects metric
M4	Cost per work unit	Cost normalized to completed work	Total cost / successful work units	30–70% lower than on-demand	Hard to normalize across jobs
M5	Mean time to recover	Time to restore capacity after mass eviction	Incident start to capacity restored	< 15 minutes with automation	Depends on pre-warmed pools
M6	Duplicate processing rate	Duplicate job executions caused by interruptions	Duplicate IDs / total jobs	< 0.1%	Requires idempotent instrumentation
M7	Spot-backed latency impact	User latency change when spot used	Latency delta when spillover occurs	< 10% delta	Must segment traffic
M8	Cost variance	Variability in expected savings	Stddev of spot cost / mean	Low variance targeted	Price or capacity shifts cause spikes
M9	Termination notice coverage	Fraction of evictions with notice	Evictions with notice / total evictions	95%	Some providers occasionally skip notices
M10	Spot capacity fulfillment	Fraction of requested spot instances that launched	Launched / requested	> 90% under normal demand	Large bulk requests often fail

Row Details (only if needed)

• None

Best tools to measure spot instances

Tool — Prometheus + Grafana

• What it measures for spot instances: Instance lifecycle events, eviction rates, pod reschedule times, custom job metrics.
• Best-fit environment: Kubernetes and VM-based fleets.
• Setup outline:
• Export instance and pod lifecycle metrics to Prometheus.
• Instrument job start/finish and checkpoint events.
• Create Grafana dashboards with panels for eviction and reschedule.
• Strengths:
• Flexible query language and community exporters.
• Good for custom metrics and alerting.
• Limitations:
• Requires maintenance and scaling for long retention.
• Manual instrumentation required for job-level metrics.

Tool — Cloud provider monitoring (native)

• What it measures for spot instances: Provider-side termination events, billing, and instance health.
• Best-fit environment: IaaS and managed services on a single cloud.
• Setup outline:
• Enable provider metrics and termination logs.
• Route events to central observability.
• Create alerts on termination rates and launch failures.
• Strengths:
• Direct visibility into provider events.
• Integrated with provider logging and autoscaling.
• Limitations:
• Varies per vendor in depth and retention.
• Not unified across multi-cloud.

Tool — Datadog

• What it measures for spot instances: Instance events, autoscaling behavior, cost metrics, and custom traces.
• Best-fit environment: Cloud and Kubernetes with commercial observability needs.
• Setup outline:
• Install agent on nodes and integrate cloud provider.
• Send custom job metrics and termination events.
• Use monitors and dashboards for alerts.
• Strengths:
• Rich UI and out-of-the-box cloud integrations.
• Correlates metrics, logs, and traces.
• Limitations:
• Commercial cost; sampling may hide detail.

Tool — Thundra / Ray monitoring

• What it measures for spot instances: ML/training job checkpoints, worker availability, and task distribution.
• Best-fit environment: Distributed training clusters and Ray workloads.
• Setup outline:
• Instrument training jobs to report checkpoint and worker status.
• Monitor worker churn and checkpoint age.
• Alert on checkpoint failures.
• Strengths:
• Focused on distributed compute patterns.
• Limitations:
• Suitable only for specialized workloads.

Tool — Cloud cost management tools

• What it measures for spot instances: Spot savings, cost attribution, and anomalies.
• Best-fit environment: Multi-team organizations managing budgets.
• Setup outline:
• Tag spot-backed resources for chargeback.
• Track spot vs on-demand spend.
• Alert on unexpected usage or cost increases.
• Strengths:
• Helps control financial risk.
• Limitations:
• May lag operational metrics and lack eviction detail.

Recommended dashboards & alerts for spot instances

Executive dashboard

• Panels:
• Overall spot vs on-demand spend percentage and trend.
• Spot eviction rate and 7-day trend.
• Cost per work unit comparison.
• Number of spot-backed jobs completed successfully.
• Why: Provides leaders with cost vs risk visibility.

On-call dashboard

• Panels:
• Real-time eviction stream and affected services.
• Number of evicted nodes and reschedule times.
• Failed job queue depth and duplicate processing incidents.
• Alerts and incident status.
• Why: Enables rapid incident triage and root-cause identification.

Debug dashboard

• Panels:
• Per-instance termination events and logs.
• Job checkpoint age and last checkpoint timestamp.
• Pod drain duration and grace-period violations.
• Autoscaler errors and quota exhaustion metrics.
• Why: Provides engineers with detailed signals to resolve issues.

Alerting guidance

• What should page vs ticket:
• Page: Mass eviction events causing service degradation, autoscaler failures preventing replacements, or critical job SLA breaches.
• Ticket: Routine spot eviction at expected rates, cost variance within predictable bands.
• Burn-rate guidance:
• Use error-budget burn rates to decide when to shift traffic off spot; if burn rate exceeds X (team-defined) for two consecutive windows, fallback to on-demand.
• Noise reduction tactics:
• Deduplicate alerts by grouping per logical service.
• Suppress chaff by thresholding eviction counts to only page on large spikes.
• Use alert dedupe keys for node group or cluster to avoid multiple pages.

---

Implementation Guide (Step-by-step)

1) Prerequisites – Inventory of workloads and classification by tolerance to interruption. – Cloud quotas and IAM roles set for autoscaler and pipelines. – Durable object storage and message queues for checkpointing and retries. – Observability platform capable of ingesting instance lifecycle events.

2) Instrumentation plan – Instrument job lifecycle: start, checkpoint, resume, complete, fail. – Publish instance lifecycle events (launch, termination, notice) to monitoring. – Tag resources to enable cost attribution.

3) Data collection – Collect provider termination notices, instance metadata, and cloud billing data. – Collect application metrics: job duration, checkpoint age, retries. – Centralize logs (termination handler logs, pod events).

4) SLO design – Define separate SLOs for critical services and spot-backed services. – Example: Noncritical batch job success rate 99% with 5% error budget for spot interruptions.

5) Dashboards – Build executive, on-call, and debug dashboards described earlier. – Include cost and performance panels.

6) Alerts & routing – Set alert tiers for eviction storms, autoscaler failures, and job SLA breaches. – Route paging to on-call SREs and notification to product owners for cost anomalies.

7) Runbooks & automation – Document runbook steps for drain, failover, and capacity fallback. – Automate termination handling: cordon, drain, checkpoint, requeue.

8) Validation (load/chaos/game days) – Run chaos tests that simulate mass spot evictions and validate rescheduling. – Measure recovery time and job completion under these conditions.

9) Continuous improvement – Review incidents monthly, tune checkpoint frequency, and iteratively increase spot usage.

Pre-production checklist

• All workloads classified by interruption tolerance.
• Instrumentation for lifecycle and job metrics present.
• IAM roles and quotas verified.
• Test termination handler with simulated notices.
• CI pipelines validate checkpoint/resume logic.

Production readiness checklist

• Autoscaler and fallback policies in place.
• Alert thresholds tuned with noise reduction.
• Cost dashboards and chargeback tags available.
• Recovery time within acceptable targets per SLO.
• Runbooks accessible and tested.

Incident checklist specific to spot instances

• Identify affected node group and check termination events.
• Confirm whether termination notice arrived and actions taken.
• Check checkpoint state and requeue unprocessed tasks.
• Verify autoscaler capacity and quota status.
• Escalate to cloud provider if eviction is widespread or unexplained.

Kubernetes example

• What to do: Create spot node pool with taints, implement termination handler, configure podDisruptionBudgets for critical services, and set autoscaler fallback.
• Verify: Node termination test triggers graceful drain and pods reschedule to other pools.

Managed cloud service example

• What to do: Configure managed batch service with preemptible tasks, enable checkpoint to object store, and set retry policies.
• Verify: Simulated preemption causes job resume from checkpoint and metrics reflect expected retry count.

---

Use Cases of spot instances

1) Large-scale ML training – Context: Training multi-hour models with distributed workers. – Problem: High GPU compute costs. – Why spot helps: Cheap GPU hours for non-critical epochs with checkpointing. – What to measure: Checkpoint success rate, job completion time, cost per epoch. – Typical tools: Cluster manager (Ray), object storage for checkpoints.

2) Nightly ETL backfills – Context: Data warehouse backfills during off-peak hours. – Problem: Large compute windows can be expensive. – Why spot helps: Cost-effective for non-time-sensitive processing. – What to measure: Job completion rate and data correctness. – Typical tools: Spark on spot instances, Airflow.

3) CI runners for non-blocking tests – Context: Large test matrix with optional long-running tests. – Problem: Keeping CI fast and affordable. – Why spot helps: Run long tests on spot, keep quick tests on on-demand. – What to measure: Build success rate and queue time. – Typical tools: GitLab runners on spot, Jenkins.

4) Video rendering and transcoding – Context: Batch media processing jobs. – Problem: High CPU/GPU costs and variability in job size. – Why spot helps: Scale out at low cost for batch rendering jobs. – What to measure: Throughput per dollar and requeue rate. – Typical tools: Batch queues, object storage.

5) Distributed training hyperparameter sweep – Context: Running many parallel experiments. – Problem: Compute budget constraints. – Why spot helps: Run many experiments cheaply and accept some losses. – What to measure: Completed experiments per cost and checkpoint coverage. – Typical tools: Kubernetes jobs, ML frameworks.

6) Backend for ephemeral feature experiments – Context: Testing experimental features with low traffic. – Problem: Cost of running separate environments. – Why spot helps: Run experiment clusters cheaply for short durations. – What to measure: Experiment uptime and incident impact. – Typical tools: Feature flagging systems, spot pools.

7) Data science sandbox environments – Context: Developer sandboxes for exploratory work. – Problem: Idle compute costs. – Why spot helps: Provide interactive environments at low cost with auto-stop. – What to measure: Idle instance time and user satisfaction. – Typical tools: Notebooks on spot-backed VMs.

8) High-throughput background workers – Context: Asynchronous background processing for analytics. – Problem: Bursty processing windows. – Why spot helps: Scale out for bursts without sustained cost. – What to measure: Queue depth reduction and processing latency. – Typical tools: Celery, queue systems on spot nodes.

9) Disaster recovery test runs – Context: Periodic DR simulation. – Problem: Cost of dedicated DR compute. – Why spot helps: Run test DR scenarios cost-effectively. – What to measure: Recovery time and data integrity. – Typical tools: IaC to spin up spot resources transiently.

10) MapReduce-style data jobs – Context: Large-scale map/reduce cluster jobs. – Problem: Compute costs and long run times. – Why spot helps: Massive scale at reduced cost with tolerance to node loss. – What to measure: Job throughput, recompute rates. – Typical tools: Hadoop/Spark on spot clusters.

---

Scenario Examples (Realistic, End-to-End)

Scenario #1 — Kubernetes: Batch ML training on spot nodes

Context: A team trains models using distributed workers in Kubernetes. Goal: Reduce cost while ensuring most training jobs complete. Why spot instances matters here: GPUs are expensive; spot reduces cost for large-scale training. Architecture / workflow: Mixed node pools: on-demand master + spot GPU worker pools with checkpointing to object store; termination handler on nodes. Step-by-step implementation:

1. Create spot GPU node pool with taints.
2. Label jobs with tolerations to schedule on spot nodes.
3. Implement training code to checkpoint every N minutes to object store.
4. Deploy node termination handler to trigger checkpoint and cordon.
5. Configure autoscaler with fallback to smaller on-demand nodes for critical runs. What to measure: Checkpoint frequency success, job completion rate, cost per epoch. Tools to use and why: Kubernetes, Prometheus, object storage, Ray or Horovod for distributed training. Common pitfalls: Long checkpoint times blocking termination window; insufficient pre-warmed nodes. Validation: Simulate node terminations during training and verify resume from checkpoint. Outcome: 60–80% GPU cost reduction with 95% job completion when policies applied.

Scenario #2 — Serverless/managed-PaaS: Batch tasks with managed preemptible workers

Context: A managed batch PaaS supports preemptible workers for background jobs. Goal: Reduce cost without changing application code dramatically. Why spot instances matters here: Managed preemptible workers provide discount with provider-managed lifecycle. Architecture / workflow: Submit jobs to managed batch API with preemptible flag; provider handles worker allocation and preemption; application checkpoint to object storage. Step-by-step implementation:

1. Flag batch jobs as preemptible in job definition.
2. Ensure job logic can restart and check for partial outputs.
3. Monitor job restarts and checkpoint coverage.
4. Configure error margins and fallback to non-preemptible for critical runs. What to measure: Job restart rate and completed jobs per schedule. Tools to use and why: Managed batch service, object storage, provider monitoring. Common pitfalls: Assuming provider always sends notice; cost spikes when fallback kicks in. Validation: Force provider-side preemption in a test environment and verify resume. Outcome: Significant cost savings for non-urgent batch jobs with minimal code changes.

Scenario #3 — Incident-response/postmortem: Mass spot eviction during peak

Context: Mass eviction of spot nodes during a retail peak hour. Goal: Understand root cause and prevent recurrence. Why spot instances matters here: Spot-backed cache nodes were evicted, causing backend saturation. Architecture / workflow: Mixed fleet with on-demand baseline and spot cache layer without replication. Step-by-step implementation:

1. Triage: identify affected node pools and eviction timelines.
2. Check termination notices, autoscaler logs, and quota.
3. Rebuild capacity via on-demand fallback and restore cache from backups.
4. Postmortem: identify lack of replication and missing PDBs as root cause. What to measure: Time to recovery, cache hit rates, customer error rates during event. Tools to use and why: Monitoring, logs, cache metrics, autoscaler logs. Common pitfalls: No test for mass eviction and lack of reserve capacity. Validation: Run controlled eviction chaos tests and measure recovery time. Outcome: New policy added to replicate caches and keep minimal on-demand baseline.

Scenario #4 — Cost/performance trade-off: CI pipeline at scale

Context: A large project with thousands of daily builds. Goal: Reduce CI cost without slowing developer feedback loop. Why spot instances matters here: Non-blocking, long test jobs can run on spot; keep critical jobs on-demand. Architecture / workflow: CI runners tagged as spot for long tests; fast tests on on-demand runners. Step-by-step implementation:

1. Classify tests as critical or optional.
2. Create spot runner pool for optional tests with checkpointing for long jobs.
3. Add retry logic to rebuild jobs if preempted.
4. Monitor build queue times and failure rates. What to measure: Build success rate, queue time, cost per build. Tools to use and why: GitLab/GitHub Actions with self-hosted runners, Prometheus for metrics. Common pitfalls: Tests that implicitly require state lost when runners preempt. Validation: Simulate runner preemption while a job runs and ensure proper re-queue. Outcome: Reduced CI costs with no noticeable degradation in developer throughput.

---

Common Mistakes, Anti-patterns, and Troubleshooting

List of mistakes with Symptom -> Root cause -> Fix (selected 20)

1. Symptom: Jobs repeatedly fail after spot eviction -> Root cause: No checkpoint or durable output -> Fix: Implement periodic checkpointing to object storage.
2. Symptom: Massive restart storm after eviction -> Root cause: All jobs retry immediately -> Fix: Add jittered exponential backoff to retries.
3. Symptom: On-call gets paged for minor spot evictions -> Root cause: Alerts fire for every termination -> Fix: Threshold alerts to eviction storm size and group by service.
4. Symptom: Autoscaler not replacing instances -> Root cause: IAM or quota issues -> Fix: Validate autoscaler permissions and increase quotas.
5. Symptom: Job duplication causing data inconsistency -> Root cause: Non-idempotent processing -> Fix: Add idempotency keys and dedupe logic.
6. Symptom: Cold-start delays when scaling -> Root cause: No warm pool or pre-warmed AMIs -> Fix: Maintain minimal warm pool or use faster images.
7. Symptom: Cost spikes when fallback triggers -> Root cause: No budget alerts for on-demand fallback -> Fix: Alert on sudden on-demand cost increases and set caps.
8. Symptom: Unexpected data loss after node kill -> Root cause: Local ephemeral storage used without replication -> Fix: Move state to persistent volumes or object stores.
9. Symptom: Kubernetes pods stuck during drain -> Root cause: Long shutdown hooks exceed grace period -> Fix: Increase grace period or optimize shutdown hooks.
10. Symptom: Spot availability inconsistent per zone -> Root cause: Single-zone reliance -> Fix: Use cross-zone / cross-region strategies.
11. Symptom: Monitoring gap during eviction -> Root cause: No termination handler sending events -> Fix: Implement handler that logs events to monitoring.
12. Symptom: Poor job scheduling due to node labels -> Root cause: Misconfigured taints/tolerations -> Fix: Audit labels and scheduling constraints.
13. Symptom: High duplicate task counts in queues -> Root cause: Ack semantics misused in message queue -> Fix: Use proper ack and visibility timeout settings.
14. Symptom: Long resume time for ML training -> Root cause: Checkpoints too large and slow to restore -> Fix: Optimize checkpoint frequency and serialization.
15. Symptom: Unexpected billing for spot instances -> Root cause: Mis-tagged resources or on-demand fallback not tracked -> Fix: Enforce tagging and billing alerts.
16. Symptom: Eviction notice ignored by application -> Root cause: Missing signal handling in process -> Fix: Add signal handlers to gracefully checkpoint.
17. Symptom: Service degraded during mass eviction -> Root cause: Insufficient on-demand baseline -> Fix: Reserve minimum baseline capacity for critical services.
18. Symptom: Failed spot launches during scale-out -> Root cause: Large single request exceeds available capacity -> Fix: Shard requests and broaden instance types.
19. Symptom: Security team flags overprivileged automation -> Root cause: Broad IAM for autoscaler -> Fix: Use least-privilege IAM roles scoped to required actions.
20. Symptom: Hard to attribute costs -> Root cause: Lack of tags and cost center mapping -> Fix: Enforce tagging policy and cost exports.

Observability pitfalls (at least 5)

21. Symptom: Missing termination logs -> Root cause: No handler to forward events -> Fix: Install termination handler that posts to logging.
22. Symptom: Unable to trace job failures -> Root cause: No correlation IDs across checkpoints -> Fix: Add global job IDs and propagate in logs.
23. Symptom: Dashboards show aggregated eviction but not service impact -> Root cause: Lack of per-service metrics -> Fix: Instrument service-level SLI mapping.
24. Symptom: Low signal-to-noise in alerts -> Root cause: Alert thresholds too low and no dedupe -> Fix: Rework alert logic using burn-rate and grouping.
25. Symptom: Postmortem lacks timeline -> Root cause: No event correlation across systems -> Fix: Centralize events and use consistent timestamps.

---

Best Practices & Operating Model

Ownership and on-call

• Assign a spot-capacity owner responsible for spot fleet health and cost optimization.
• On-call rotation should include an engineer familiar with spot automation and runbooks.
• Create escalation paths to cloud platform and budget owners.

Runbooks vs playbooks

• Runbook: Step-by-step remedial actions for common events (eviction storms, autoscaler failures).
• Playbook: Higher-level decision guidance for cost-risk trade-offs, e.g., when to flip a cluster from spot to on-demand.

Safe deployments (canary/rollback)

• Canary small percentages of traffic on spot-backed instances before scaling broader.
• Use automatic rollback if key metrics degrade beyond thresholds tied to SLOs.

Toil reduction and automation

• Automate termination handling, checkpointing, and fallback-to-on-demand.
• Use IaC templates to avoid configuration drift.
• Automate cost alerts and resource tagging.

Security basics

• Use least-privilege IAM roles for autoscalers and termination handlers.
• Encrypt checkpoints and ensure object store access is restricted.
• Audit instance metadata access and avoid leaking secrets on spot nodes.

Weekly/monthly routines

• Weekly: Review spot eviction rates and job completion trends.
• Monthly: Reassess node types, instance pools, and cost savings versus risk.
• Quarterly: Run chaos experiments for mass evictions.

What to review in postmortems related to spot instances

• Timeline of eviction events, actions taken, and recovery times.
• Whether term notices were received and acted on.
• Whether checkpoints and idempotency worked as designed.
• Cost impact of fallback measures.

What to automate first

• Termination handler that triggers checkpoint and drain.
• Auto-fallback to on-demand when eviction rates exceed thresholds.
• Automated tagging and cost attribution pipelines.

---

Tooling & Integration Map for spot instances (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Category	What it does	Key integrations	Notes
I1	Orchestrator	Schedules workloads and handles node pools	Kubernetes, cloud autoscaler	Core control plane
I2	Monitoring	Collects instance and job metrics	Prometheus, cloud metrics	Essential for SLIs
I3	Logging	Centralizes termination logs	ELK, cloud logging	Critical for postmortem
I4	Cost management	Tracks spot vs on-demand spend	Billing exports, tags	Monitor cost leakage
I5	Batch scheduler	Runs batch jobs with retries	Airflow, AWS Batch	Manages job lifecycle
I6	Checkpoint storage	Stores job checkpoints reliably	Object storage, S3-like	Durable state store
I7	Autoscaler	Scales node groups and fallback	Cluster autoscaler	Must support mixed instances
I8	Chaos tooling	Simulates preemption and failures	Chaos Mesh, Litmus	Validates resilience
I9	CI tooling	Runs builds on spot runners	GitLab, Jenkins	Cost-efficient CI runs
I10	ML frameworks	Supports distributed training with checkpointing	Ray, TensorFlow	Integrates checkpoint logic
I11	IAM & policies	Controls permissions for automation	Cloud IAM	Least-privilege required
I12	Termination handler	Detects notices and runs shutdown	Custom agents	Must be reliable
I13	Queue systems	Durable message passing for workers	RabbitMQ, SQS	Supports retries and ack mgmt
I14	Cost alerts	Notifies on sudden bill changes	Cloud billing alerts	Protects budgets
I15	Image builder	Creates optimized images for fast boot	Packer, image pipelines	Improves launch time

Row Details (only if needed)

• None

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

How do I detect spot termination quickly?

Use provider termination notices and run a lightweight termination handler that logs events and triggers drain and checkpoint actions within the notice window.

How do I choose which workloads to move to spot?

Classify by interruption tolerance: stateless, replayable, inexpensive to checkpoint, and non-user-impacting jobs are good candidates.

How does spot differ across clouds?

Behavior varies: notice windows, naming, and allocation strategies differ. Check provider documentation for exact semantics — Not publicly stated for generalization.

What’s better: spot or reserved?

They serve different needs: spot optimizes cost with risk of eviction; reserved optimizes predictable capacity and lower cost with commitment.

How do I avoid duplicate processing with spot failures?

Implement idempotency keys, durable queues, and checkpointing to detect and prevent duplicate side-effects.

How does spot affect SLOs?

Spot-backed components should have separate SLOs or explicit allowances in SLO calculations to reflect expected interruptions.

What monitoring should I add first?

Start with eviction rate, termination notices, job completion rate, and time-to-reschedule metrics.

How can small teams start safely with spot?

Begin with noncritical batch jobs and test terminations in a dev environment before scaling to production.

How do I handle stateful workloads?

Generally avoid unless using durable replication and immediate failover mechanisms to persistent volumes.

How much cost savings can I expect?

Varies / depends.

How do I test resilience to spot eviction?

Run chaos tests that simulate termination notices and mass evictions, and measure recovery metrics.

What’s the difference between spot and preemptible?

They are similar; “preemptible” is a vendor term and specifics vary in notice length and reclaim policy.

How to prevent large-scale correlated failures?

Use multi-AZ and multi-instance-type strategies, avoid single-zone reliance, and maintain baseline on-demand capacity.

How do I forecast spot costs?

Use historical eviction and price data if available and maintain safety margins for fallback costs.

How should alerts be structured?

Page on mass evictions affecting SLOs; ticket on routine expected evictions that do not impact SLIs.

How to integrate spot with Kubernetes autoscaler?

Use mixed-instance groups and configure the autoscaler to consider node pools with fallback to on-demand when necessary.

What’s the difference between spot and on-demand autoscaling?

Autoscaling behavior similar, but spot may fail to provision capacity and requires fallback and diversified instance types.

How do I secure spot nodes?

Apply least-privilege IAM, encrypt checkpoints, and avoid storing secrets on ephemeral disks.

---

Conclusion

Spot instances enable significant cost optimization when used with appropriate automation, checkpointing, and observability. They require an operating model that separates critical from non-critical workloads, clear SLOs, and regular validation through chaos tests.

Next 7 days plan (5 bullets)

• Day 1: Inventory and classify workloads by interruption tolerance.
• Day 2: Implement termination handler and basic checkpointing for one batch job.
• Day 3: Add eviction rate and job completion metrics to monitoring.
• Day 4: Run a controlled termination test and validate rescheduling and resume.
• Day 5–7: Build dashboards, tune alerts, and schedule a post-test review with stakeholders.

---

Appendix — spot instances Keyword Cluster (SEO)

• Primary keywords
• spot instances
• preemptible VMs
• spot VMs
• spot instances guide
• spot instances tutorial
• spot instance best practices
• spot instance architecture
• spot instance use cases
• spot instance checklist

• spot instance monitoring

• Related terminology

• eviction rate
• termination notice
• mixed instance group
• checkpointing strategy
• spot fleet
• capacity fallback
• node drain
• pod disruption budget
• idempotent processing
• pre-warmed pool
• autoscaler fallback
• job checkpoint frequency
• durable object store
• cost per work unit
• launch template optimization
• eviction storm
• spot price volatility
• quota limits
• IAM least privilege
• warm pool best practices
• pod termination lifecycle
• retry backoff strategy
• chaos testing spot preemption
• spot-aware scheduler
• spot vs reserved instance
• spot vs on-demand
• transient worker nodes
• ephemeral compute savings
• batch job spot usage
• ML training spot nodes
• GPU spot instances
• CI on spot runners
• managed preemptible workers
• object storage checkpoints
• cluster autoscaler spot
• tagging for cost attribution
• cost management spot
• spot monitoring dashboards
• termination handler implementation
• spot best practices checklist
• mixed fleet autoscaling
• region zone variability
• spot capacity fulfillment
• time to reschedule metric
• duplicate processing prevention
• spot SLO design
• observability for spot
• spot incident runbook
• spot-run game day
• preemptible compute patterns
• spot instance failure modes
• spot instance recovery time
• spot-backed Kubernetes node pool
• checkpoint restore optimization
• spot image builder
• minimal baseline on-demand
• spot cost variance
• spot billing granularity
• spot termination handler logging
• spot lifecycle events
• spot worker orchestration
• spot capacity optimization
• spot autoscaling policies
• spot vs preemptible differences
• spot instance security
• spot-driven cost reduction
• spot orchestration patterns
• spot training resume
• spot preemption simulation
• spot-run observability
• spot-run dashboards
• spot-run alerts
• spot-run playbook
• spot-run runbook
• spot outage mitigation
• spot capacity pre-warming
• spot instance strategies
• spot resource reclamation
• spot termination coverage
• spot reschedule time
• spot job dedupe
• spot-run automation
• spot SLA considerations
• spot incident postmortem
• spot workload classification
• spot fallback rules
• spot cost forecasting
• spot usage patterns
• spot vs reserved ROI
• spot training checkpoint frequency
• spot cluster design
• spot safe deployments
• spot-run security best practices
• spot orchestration integration
• spot-run tools integration
• spot management policies
• spot instance FAQ
• spot implementation guide
• spot operating model
• spot optimization techniques
• spot capacity orchestration
• spot lifecycle management
• spot readiness checklist
• spot production readiness
• spot observability pitfalls
• spot automation priorities
• spot preemption notice handling
• spot continuous improvement
• spot-runney testing strategies
• spot monitoring SLIs
• spot metrics to track
• spot dashboards recommended
• spot incident checklist
• spot run maintenance routines
• spot resourcing decision checklist
• spot cluster autoscaler integration
• spot-run trade-offs analysis
• spot cost and performance trade-off
• spot playbook for SREs